Are Amazon Sales Down Since the Boycott? Full Analysis & Insights (2025)

Are Amazon sales down since the boycott?

Introduction

Amazon Prime Day has become one of the biggest shopping events of the year, and in 2025, it’s set to be even bigger than ever. This annual sale event gives Amazon Prime members exclusive deals, and it offers businesses an incredible opportunity to boost their sales, visibility, and brand awareness. But to truly capitalize on the success of Amazon Prime Day, having the right strategies in place for managing your Amazon account is crucial. In this blog, we’ll take a deep dive into the latest trends, updates, and services related to Amazon accounts, and explore how professional Amazon account management can help boost your sales and improve performance during Prime Day 2025.

Understanding the Scale and Nature of the Boycott:

To evaluate whether Amazon’s sales declined due to the boycott, we first need to understand the characteristics of the event itself. A corporate boycott is only as influential as the scale, consistency, and behavioural commitment of the participating consumer base.

Amazon, as a multinational corporation embedded in multiple layers of the global economy, is affected differently by boycotts compared to traditional retailers. The company’s operational scale, enormous logistics network, ecosystem-based services, subscription loyalty and digital infrastructure make it significantly more resistant to abrupt shifts in consumer purchasing behaviour.

Historical context of consumer boycotts:

Boycotts succeed when they demonstrate at least one of the following:

Mass participation
Long duration
Corporate vulnerability
Reputational risk that forces change
Political/regulatory pressure amplification
Clear alternative options for consumers

When boycotts target companies with fragile market positions, limited diversification or declining brand loyalty, they can trigger immediate demand shocks.

Amazon, however, holds unique counterweights:

A vast third-party marketplace
A habit-driven Prime ecosystem
Logistics convenience unmatched by competitors
High switching costs for Prime subscribers
A wide digital services catalogue
Increasing reliance by small and mid-size sellers
Deep cloud infrastructure integration (AWS).

Nature of the Amazon boycott:

The Amazon boycott in question emerged through organised social pressure, with the common themes usually associated with activism against large technology companies: labour concerns, anti-monopoly sentiments, data privacy issues, marketplace dominance, and perceived inequities in the treatment of sellers or workers.

However, the boycott’s duration was short, its behavioural adoption unclear, and its global reach uneven. Campaigns that last only a week rarely cause a measurable dent in a corporation generating hundreds of billions in sales annually. However, their symbolic function can be powerful.

Scope of the boycott:

Some participants aimed to avoid:

Amazon’s retail marketplace
Amazon-owned products
Amazon subsidiaries
Prime subscription usage
Amazon Fresh and Whole Foods
Digital content purchases

However, avoidance requires behavioural change, and Amazon’s convenience-oriented ecosystem makes such change operationally difficult for many consumers. Habit, speed, lack of alternatives, and the breadth of Amazon’s offerings reduce boycott adoption rates.

Take the next strategic step toward expanding your brand’s performance.

Unlock expert insights with a complimentary audit tailored to your business.

Get Your Free Audit

Amazon’s Financial Performance — What the Data Signals:

To determine whether Amazon’s sales declined, one must interpret its reported financial performance over the periods before, during, and after the boycott.

Revenue trends:

Amazon’s revenue trajectory remains upward across most reporting periods. Although growth rates have moderated relative to peak pandemic years, the absolute level of net sales continues to expand. For a boycott to materially reduce revenue, it must overpower the company’s organic growth rate—which itself is substantial.

Segment-specific growth patterns:

Amazon is not a monolithic entity. It comprises multiple segments with varying sensitivities to consumer behaviour:

Consumer-Facing Segments:

First-party retail
Third-party marketplace services
Subscriptions (Prime)
Devices (Kindle, Fire, Echo)
Physical stores (Whole Foods, Amazon Fresh)

Business & Infrastructure Segments:

Amazon Web Services
Advertising
Logistics as a service
Digital media and content
AI and machine learning services

A retail boycott primarily affects consumer-facing units, not enterprise-level units. AWS, advertising, and subscription-based services are structurally insulated from short-term consumer abstention campaigns.

As a result, even if retail sales experience marginal or localised weakening, total revenue, operating income and net profit may remain unaffected or even improve due to gains in higher-margin segments.

Evaluating Whether Sales Declined — The Core Question:

After examining Amazon’s behaviour across segments, we now address the central question: Did Amazon’s sales decline?

Absolute sales levels did not decline:

All available financial signals show continued growth in total sales. Growth rates varied, but the direction remained positive. Declines that would reflect boycott impact—such as sharp week-over-week downturns, quarter-to-quarter contractions, or negative year-over-year trends—did not materialise.

Growth moderation misinterpreted as decline:

Moderated growth is not equivalent to shrinking sales. Large-scale corporations often experience decelerating growth due to:

Base effect (law of large numbers)
Slower global retail environment
Economic uncertainty
Currency fluctuations
High-interest-rate environments
Supply-chain recalibration
Shifts in consumer discretionary spending.

Some commentators misattribute moderated growth to boycott impact, even though moderating growth is typical for mature companies.

Marketplace behaviour remains strong:

Amazon’s third-party marketplace continues to expand. Sellers rely heavily on the platform, and consumer purchasing behaviour in categories like household essentials, electronics, home goods, books, apparel, and recurring convenience items remains deeply entrenched. Boycotts struggle to persuade consumers to abandon essential or routine buying behaviours.

Indicator	Before Boycott	After Boycott Period	Interpretation
Quarterly Net Sales	Strong, steady year-over-year increases	Growth continues, momentum slightly moderated	No material decline; broader economic factors at play
Operating Income	Expanding margin improvement	Continues upward due to efficiency gains	Indicates resilience across business units
Forward Sales Guidance	Higher projected growth bandwidth	Moderated growth expectations	Reflects macro-economic conditions, not boycott effects

Why Boycotts Rarely Dent Amazon’s Core Business?

Habitual behavioural patterns:

Amazon has conditioned millions of consumers into behavioural reflex loops:

Open the Amazon app
Search
Add to cart
Same-day or next-day convenience
Predictive product suggestions
Seamless return policies
Trusted delivery speed

These habits override boycott motivations for a significant portion of the population.

Prime ecosystem stickiness:

Prime is one of Amazon’s strongest retention mechanisms. Members associate value with:

Free fast shipping
Prime Video
Prime Music
Prime Reading
Cloud photo storage
Exclusive discounts
Early access deals

Consumers who pay for Prime feel incentivised to continue purchasing through the ecosystem, reducing boycott effectiveness.

Lack of equivalent alternatives:

While competitors exist (Walmart, Target, niche e-commerce stores, Temu, etc.), few match Amazon’s combined:

Selection
Speed
Pricing competitiveness
End-to-end logistics capabilities

Boycotts fail when substitutes lack parity in convenience.

Macro-Economic Factors — The Real Drivers Behind Sales Trends:

Many interpreting slowed growth mistakenly attribute it to the boycott. In reality, macro-economic drivers are the more dominant influence.

Inflation’s impact on discretionary spending:

Consumers facing inflation tend to:

Delay purchases
Reduce non-essential buying
Shift toward essentials
Seek value and discounts

This behaviour affects all retail companies, not only Amazon.

Foreign exchange headwinds:

Currency fluctuations reduce the value of international revenue when converted into domestic reporting currency. That alone can slow apparent growth more than consumer boycotts.

Interest rate environment

High interest rates affect:

Capital investment
Logistics costs
Seller margins
Consumer confidence

These issues overshadow small-scale boycott pressures.

Behavioural Science Insights — Why Boycotts Don’t Stick:

Moral intention vs actual behaviour:

A large percentage of consumers may express boycott support verbally, but action requires effort and sacrifice, causing a mismatch between intention and execution.

Inconvenience cost outweighs moral value:

The perceived inconvenience of not using Amazon often exceeds the moral reward of participating in the boycott.

Social visibility determines adoption:

Boycotts with limited social pressure or absence of immediate public visibility tend to fade quickly.

Hypothetical Modelling — What It Would Take for Sales to Actually Decline:

To materially dent Amazon’s sales, a boycott would need to achieve:

High participation rates
Long-term duration (months, not days)
Strong social reinforcement
Media pressure
Regulatory involvement
Seller withdrawal from the platform
Alternative platforms gaining traction

Currently, none of these thresholds have been met.

Conclusion — Are Amazon Sales Down Since the Boycott?

After an exhaustive evaluation from financial, behavioural, strategic, macro-economic, and structural angles, the conclusion is clear and definitive:

Amazon’s sales are not down since the boycott.

Sales continue to grow, although growth has moderated for reasons unrelated to boycott pressure. The boycott did not produce a measurable downturn in purchasing behaviour, financial results, or operational performance at the company-wide level.

Amazon’s global ecosystem, logistics dominance, Prime loyalty, and diversified business portfolio—particularly higher-margin segments like advertising and cloud infrastructure—buffer the company from the impacts of short-term consumer activism.

Did the boycott cause any measurable decline in Amazon’s retail sales?

No measurable decline has been observed. Retail trends remain stable and aligned with broader industry patterns. Growth moderation is not linked to boycott activity.

Could a larger, more organised boycott eventually impact Amazon?

Yes—if it were sustained, global, and involved millions of high-frequency Amazon users. However, this scenario requires a level of coordination and behavioural change rarely achieved.

Why do Amazon’s sales appear resilient even when faced with public criticism?

Amazon’s business model is heavily diversified. Large components of its revenue, such as cloud services and advertising, are not directly affected by consumer boycotts. Additionally, habit-driven purchasing behaviour and Prime membership create user stickiness.

Is growth moderation a sign of boycott impact?

No. Growth moderation is a macro-economic effect: inflation, interest rates, currency fluctuations, and overall retail cycles influence performance more significantly than short-term consumer activism

Mary
November 24, 2025
2:09 pm
Reading time 10 min

All Services

Other Services

Inactive

Inactive

All Services

Other Services

Inactive

Inactive